>>2200129Sweet art, here's a fancier AI upscale. Detail here should be extremely higher.
>>2200146Anon this looks like you squashed the image height by a few pixels to fit 16:9 rather than chop off an edge, it seems preserve as much of the image content as you can but this forces the interpolator to try to average out pixels across only one axis. You preserve more detail by cropping a strip off one edge to the right ratio and then scaling the whole image up/down.
Not taking a dig at you, you're still doing work, just a detail for photo edit anons.
