>>1600616It's more than just thickness, it's about the placement and curvyness of the lines. It looks like a mess. Even if he followed the original closely, it looks bad to me. Sounds like it's just the artists style and it's definitely not an image I would've have picked up. That was my critique of it. In the end this is all about artistic opinions, if he estimates it good as it is, he's free to ignore my comment. I'll leave an example pointing out what I mean mostly.
