>>1557348>This was really helpful, though I can't understand should l decrease or increase consistency?>I decreased it after my second try but you confused me a bit now.No, no.. Consistency has nothing to do with thickness. It means that, if you choose a thickness, you should keep with that thickness for that type of object.
It also means that, if you pick a line style, you stay with that line style for the object..
In the picture I was commenting on, you had two styles of lines - the line that goes through the hair as a whole making a "solid" outline, and another part that had strands of hair making an outline.
I just separated them into two groups to enhance the difference in techniques used.
As it is: Your lines are too thin for the hair - they are not going to give it ANY depth, because of that. So you should look at the thickness I am using on both halves.
See how it is thin, but not insanely thin? It gives a hint of delicacy to the lines, without making them insubstantial.
To help you out a bit:
* the BLUE circle is the thickness your hair should be.
* The YELLOW is the thickness for the skin
* The RED is the thickness of the clothing.
You should keep them CONSISTENT with each other. Ergo: you should try to make everything of that type of object have those circled areas be the maximum thickness of the lines, and when you do tapers, they should be gradual and thin, but not insanely so.
Look at your image again, and look at what I did on the LEFT. Yours should look close to that, but NOT exact - I put those lines up quickly to give an example and make a point, not to do the vector for you.
My best suggestion is: stop working on the vector a moment, let what I and JPGC said digest, and then look at the image again with this information processed. It will keep you from getting frustrated from having to redo the lines, as well as point you in the direction to just adjust the levers (and a few nodes) to get the desired affect you're looking for.
