>>1533512Other than the glow mentioned, here's somethings I found. Mostly line thickness consistencies, but the rose on her belt has barely any shading, while the one in her hair is all sorts of shade and texture.
Now, another thing I can suggest is to vary your line thicknesses in a consistent way. here's what I mean:
* Hair should be thin - if anything, it should be the thinnest lines you have on the image, other then, say, the roses (if they are "real") for this explanation, I am going to give them the value of .5, or about half the thickness of the flesh lines.
* Flesh lines should be the standard of 1, because that's the base of all the other line thicknesses.
* Clothing should be a thickness of about 1.5. The only exceptions to this are lines from super-thin materials, sheer materials or fraying materials (which you have here). If I had doen this, I would have started the clothing with a thickness of 1.5, then very, very gradually (as I got closer to the frayed areas) taper it to .75 for the frays.
The reason I suggest this, is because the image looks good, but it could look so much BETTER. There is nothing that makes the image "pop" or have "body" it is too uniform, even with the few small places you went past consistency..
Hope this suggestion helps...
