>>18819381) To an extent, yes. If something looks like messy lineart from the original, then you can smooth it out. However, that is not always the case. Sometimes the only issue you're having is that you have misused then nodes or handles. Here is the general rule. Use smooth nodes when working along a single line. Only use a sharp node with independent handles when you meet another line that would normally be separated in a full vector. The only exceptions of course are for hair or the ends of certain things like eyebrows or clothing. For smooth nodes, extend the handles out further. The close they are to the node, the sharper they will be. You do not want to extend them too far to the point that the fill begins to flatten at the node, so there is a balance you need to play with.
2) The only advantage Interlaced has it will load the image faster. When you see an entire image load, but looks pixelated, and then after a few passes, becomes clear, then that is Interlaced. It increases the filesize and does not help with quality in any way. Instead, leave it unchecked so it exports as Progressive, which will load in bars from top to bottom. Also, make sure you are exporting with "Type Optimized (Hinted)" instead of the default "Art Optimized (Supersampling)". Type Optimized provides better aliasing than Art Optimized.
