>>1669353that's kind of silly though, and doesn't make sense within the confines of the digital world since high PPI does not guarantee a high resolution image
(
>>1669334 was 600 PPI but at only ~2Kx2K whereas
>>1668577 is also 600PPI but a lot larger).
But maybe that's just me.
>It was made for print so we generally talk the way Ai speaks.Maybe initially, but it would not be fair to say that for current versions of Illustrator.
