>>2137040>Capitalism inherently requires a state or a state-like apparatus to enforce private property and other rubbish.No it doesn't, while people by nature gather together and for societies, they do not necessarily need a "State". Two parties in disagreement are not strictly bound to shuttle all arguments and disagreements through a court, they may simply haggle an agreement between themselves right on the spot. Nor are courts bound to declare such agreements null and void simply because it was not arbitrated in the court. (Now, whether or not the agreement was "Legal" is another matter). I don't need to go to court or a government office when ever I buy an commodity from my local flea market.
As for private property, that can be simply enforced by the use of force.
>Incentives exist past monetary gain. No shit. The ability to fulfill a want or a desire is a remarkable incentive. But such things are rarely for the "general welfare of the state". At worst these things may take up precious time, resources, labor, and give no material, philosophical, or figurative benefit. Must the artist be told his time would be better spent sorting bolts instead of creating a work of art or that he does not need additional colors since he can get by mixing Red, Blue and Yellow? Must, the Historian be told that since a permanent utopia as been achieved, that recording/researching history has no real benefit?
I would also like to know how you intend to keep track of the common value of commodities with out money.
