>>1799958>>1800322Oh, no. First try with the image, not with vectoring. Sorry I worded that confusingly.
>>1800346Thanks for those marks. And original is
>>1797487, so I pretty much guessed where shadows were.
>>1800347>>1800347Yeah, I usually do that because that way you can also just hide the shadows and have a more plain version. But I was really lazy this time.
Second attempt. Tried to fix the shadows.