>>1567920>I apologize if this thread is in some way wrong or not supposed to be here, pretty new to /w/Your thread is okay, but don't expect it to live long. The problem here is that your criteria is too subjective and broad, or not relevant to many /w/ users. I think people might ignore this thread rather than riffle through their wallpaper folders and decide at length what exactly constitutes as "beautiful stuff".
Then again, a certain tripfag attention-whore might dump stuff en masse. Good luck either way.
