>>2177490>>2177491Thanks! I might have actually seen that other version before, but forgot about it. Though this version is a lot smaller and has some detail loss (and even has part of the image cut off on the left), but the color is much better. Your version does improve the texture, but there's still a lot of it present, and the color is still a lot duller.
If you search that brighter/smaller version you'll find even larger versions of it, but they all seem to be upscaled (this is the biggest one.) If you could try doing more texture work and possibly try matching the colors to the other version, that'd be great.
