>>1605553Linux barely ever has problems. At least at the rate that windows does. And I know that he didn't program the entire thing himself.
I have a good question: Have you ever worked for microsoft? Do you even know programmers that have.
Worst job imaginable. I've seen people quit to hop on with startup companies and make a fraction of the money. They give the programmers no freedom, naturally it barely improves at the rate of a more open system of development.
"Most people" Means the people who don't dump the shit off the computer when they buy it or know of no other alternative.
Those "most people" end up breaking their computers after as I said "about 9 months" if not less. Then they stupidly pay out money they don't need to pay to fix an os that almost always gradually gets worse unless you spoon feed it like a toddler.
Maybe you haven't given the right distro a chance, that's why you have choice in linux. It's not some dictatorship with indian phone operators like the operation they have down at good ol' ms.
Like I said, the manufacturers of course know the detractors to using MS and take advantage of it, yet suspiciously they never fix it.
Why hasn't ms come up with it's own free virus software by now? Because they simply don't give a fuck.
They have more than enough time to spend making easily compromised shit like active x to fuck over their users anyway.
If you like windows then fine, that's great for you, I'd rather not literally pay someone for a plethora of problems that I wouldn't have to deal with on any other os in the market.
