>>1633898You didn't argue, you where asking.
>>1633880Then (if that was you) you realized it looked less horrible when I used fill tool on the non-jpg artifact version of the image.
>>1633898I already said that I used mspaint fill tool just to prove how stupid it is to use jpg and even more so to then use png on an image that has already been destroyed by jpg as seen here
>>1630746 and here
>>1630753I didn't come to argue, I came to point out that whoever did that image modification is stupid for using png on an image that has once been jpg as it's exactly like converting mp3 to FLAC.
It was about to become an argument in the first half of this post
>>1633888but you never realized what the point was and then at the end you just flipped an grammar nazi card and acted like all the other people that doesn't know what to do unless spoon fed.
But since you like the taste of spoon I'll give you this 5 second video that tells everything you need to know about jpg and why not to use it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEzhxP-pdos 
