I can´t believe it... someone visited this thread
>>1801063>Congress passed an Internet pornography law a while back that banned the depiction of models who were adults who 'looked like' minors, or of fictitious or cartoon characters drawn to 'look like' minors, engaging in sex acts.The law, though, was REALLY badly written, and when it was challenged in court the Supreme Court struck it down as vague and unenforceable.
Congress has not revisited the issue since, so there is currently not any 'specific' law banning Lolicon.
However, even a cartoon story can be prosecuted as obscenity. If a Lolicon appears to show very young children engaged in sex acts, I doubt you'd have much trouble getting a US jury to decide it to be obscene.
EDIT - Stuart is missing the point, I'm afraid. While the Supreme Court upheld Michael Williams conviction under the PROTECT act, they did so on the basis of some computer generated images "induistuinguishable from photographs of real children".
They specifically noted in their opinion that "....virtual child pornography remained under the protection of the First Amendment, except when it was offered or solicited under the mistaken impression that actual children were depicted."
Cartoons that are clearly not depictions of real children do not, therefore, fall under the PROTECT act - although as I noted they could still be found obscene in their own content.
Richard
taken from:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080710141216AAs2ARTBut i don´t really care, Germany doesn´t give a fuck about it
>>1801167>>1801171If anyone got more of Enju i would love to get it
>>1801179Awesome quality. as expected from Sqaure Enix
And here comes
Repost:
Nr.33
