>>8085873don't get me wrong, AI is art. more often than not, it's just really bad art. everything you've posted so far is trying to emulate artistic styles that it just doesn't have the programming capacity to handle.
>>8085862>>8085870>>8085873these photorealistic ones don't look real at all
>>8085874this woodpressing is so murky that the carving should be used for kindling
>>8085875and this painting is such a muddled mess that your patron would flog your hide before casting you back out onto the streets to starve to death.
There are places that AI can put out something of borderline decent quality, it's just that YOU in particular have no clue how to phrase your prompts precisely, no clue what mistakes to omit, no clue what makes for good or bad form. you just see something that looks sort of like the picture in your head and accept that there's no improving it instead of putting in the WORK.
>>8085880yeah, my pic is this one
>>8083805I don't have as big a collection of papes since my old PC died half a year ago, and I'm still holding onto the hope that I can extract the files from the harddrive, so I don't see the point in resaving everything I lost.
