>>8092975>The process of competitive chieftaincies turning into monopolistic mini-states is obviously a move toward less privatization, not more>It seems rather unfair, then, to blame this catastrophe on privatizationWhy would it be unfair? The chieftains eventually bought all the land through wealth and thus gained power over it. Would Corporations act diferently in this case?
If so, why? Would they regulate themselves before no regulations despite having all the wealth and power to secure their dominion?
>A more plausible explanation for the Free State's decline points to the introduction of the titheI am sure it speed up the process, but i do not think this was the turning point.
Anyhow, i do believe an stateless nation would be successful and it would enjoy of many of the qualities Icelanders enjoyed at first. I do not think that a libertarian system supported on capitalism would be the correct way though.
