>>6090161OP, don't take this the wrong way, but I'm gonna deal out some constructive criticism.
If you don't want to hear it, I suggest you not read ahead.
For the most part, all these photos aren't all that great, like, at all.
Taking photos of something you -think- would be deep, or transcendent, isn't how good photos are made.
I'm gonna suggest you take some time to read up on basic composition, rule of thirds and the like. That's the first step to improving. Next, think intimately about your subject, how it makes you feel, how you'd like others to feel about it. Use the composition techniques you've just learned, and compose a shot that makes the viewer feel what you want them to feel.
>>6090188What am I supposed to feel about this? It's a pipe (or a handrail).
>inb4 it's abstractOther than that, try to hold you camera a bit more steady, as there's quite a bit of blur in a lot of them. Learn some basic processing, not every photo needs to be pushed to it's limit (not saying that these are, but moderation is key). Basic leveling and some minor adjustments should be all you need, because you would have already shot the photo with a decent outcome.
I didn't mean this post to be totally rude or anything. Just knock you down a bit, and help you build yourself back up even better.
Also, some OC.
It's an infrared shot I took a few years back when I was visiting a friend in Oklahoma.
