>>7171997well-presented, nothing flashy but it's solid 7/10
>>7172038simple and straight forward without sacrificing any function 7/10
>>7172054not especially coherent, those bars look stretched and don't mesh with the icons, i'd work on making it more uniform 3/10
>>7172063as far as how it works, i think it's great, but i don't dig the aesthetic, still 8/10
>>71721349/10 only because it isn't exactly suited to my taste, always good though
>>7172144looks really good to me, lots of icons though 7/10
>>7172146feels like a first for sure, not terrible, just basic 5/10
>>7172156boi. 9/10
>>7172157a e s t h e t i c /10
>>7172320i'm interested in this, but something feels a bit off, love the simplicity though 8/10
>>7172441too much going on for me visually 5/10
>>7172538>>7172601>>7173111>>7173642>>7173798>>7174118basic/10 - good starts
>>7173661love it 10/10
>>7173656functional, visually pleasing, but too busy for me cause minimal 8/10
