>>7716726>>7716730>>7716746I just come here to give papes and share papes, so here is mine. I don't know how old you are, but Feminism is mostly ignorant, except in fringe cases. No credible intellectual has ever argued that women are incapable, but have argued that women's ultimate desire is to raise families. Feminists hate this BTW. Women can do the same things as men, but they historically never appeared to want to so they were reared as uneducated homemakers. Yet feminists interpret the historical lack of powerful female figures as some kind of decentralized global oppression of their sex. Not true. Biologically women are fundamentally different from men as estrogen forces their brains to develop differently. This is a scientific fact. But feminists argue society is male, which is why they aren't equal to, or transgressing men. How? Society in itself is female. Manners and civility are purely feminine inventions men have adopted.
Women are shileded from death and war, which are the ultimate reality. Women soldiers and captives would be shot at and killed on the battlefield and raped by the enemy, for pleasure. Yet such activity would destroy a country morally, and make them weak. Women will not be forced (or coerced) to ultimately sacrifice their life like the boy you ridicule. Not to say he didn't do anything wrong, I mean don't go into a thread hating. What you did is exactly what he expected. When faced with the ultimate reality, feminists will inevitably realize that the male power that they seek to apprehend/transgress is simply a life of being bashed, ostracized and feminized for your aggression and status of power - exactly like you just tried to do to the boy. This makes men tougher in the long run. Aversion to, and absence of such abuse is why women will always generally remain weaker combatants. Feminists stand to change that and so they act like dicks, abrading the very society they created in the first place.
