>>6627444i don't think it's about keeping track of them but more so about lessening the number of request threads we get on here that bump good threads off.
examples:
>>6629020>>6628974>>6628755>>6628754>>6628559>>6628055which ultimately don't go anywhere because the OP doesn't propel the thread forward with any content.
plus this site isn't getting any smaller so that means we should start focusing on quality over quantity or something along those lines.
