Some people in this thread seem to have sucked their own dick in metaphysical argumentation for too long and it shows.
>>7723879>all whilst maintaining a natural degree of masculinity or femininity based on the appropriate gender>but why?Because there is a natural degree of femininity and masculinity to each individual. These can be affected as
>>7724896 has explained quite well. But that is no excuse to ignore such natural inclinations. If you want to talk about a spectrum of gender, the only real one is the sway of biological likes and dislikes, mixed with influence from the environment. (I.e. Culture) that creates a rather varied and interesting diversity in clothing, expectations, etc. world wide.
But you'll notice some things simply cannot be detached from their characterization for the sake of illusory societal 'limitations' that many left-wing people seem to imagine. Muscles and bulkiness are considered masculine, even if on a female. Long eye-lashes and wide hips are considered feminine, even if on a male. There are tomboyish girls, and there are somewhat queer men.
I'm simply saying that we can progress as a species without destroying the natural beauty of masculinity and femininity based on illusions of what we believe a secular society needs. Or creating excuses based on a misinterpretation of the previously discussed diversity within masculinity and femininity.