>>8086160So I'm guessing the one in link related is too much work or not possible? I ain't even mad. Anons have helped me out so much already(they do it for free!). I'm starting to think about the defects in old poster scans as part of the art anyway. Pic related for example:
>some shitty B-movie gets made>Italian badass Anselmo Ballestra knocks out a masterpiece for it>it gets printed and shipped to theaters>it gets taken down, stored, lost, found used, abused for unknown years>some fag finds it, scans/images it and puts it online>some other fag puts a shitty watermark on itThe watermark is like another expression of the time that has passed the same as the stains and tears on the physical poster. It's a real shame though how many awesome posters I find that only exist in shitty resolution with fucked up quality. All these posters lost in time, like tears in the rain. Thanks for reading my blog post.
