>>7048915just checked it and most of these are compressed as hell jpg. These are good, yeah, but I'd use them as base and then do a reverse image search at tineye/google.
This is an example, this link below is one of these images you posted, and the pic I posted is the "good" version, with no artifacts.
https://wallpapers.wallhaven.cc/wallpapers/full/wallhaven-580132.jpg