>>5404619Yeah, that's why I don't have as many as I could, heheh. Aside from being picky in general, I see a lot of stuff that's TECHNICALLY 1920x1080 (or higher), but it's not 1080p, or crisp, or however you wish to say it. And that goes for other sites as well of course.
It has to be a seriously good image for me to consider putting it in my folders even though it's not "up to standards" heh
Also have another favorite.
