>>7191939I haven't seen (you) post anything I can use as a pape, either. Your resolution is shit, your quality of both image and subject is shit, composition is shit for 2 out of 3, and 2 out of 3 are just plain skanky. None of them are appropriate for public display.
What are (you) even doing in this thread?
Frankly, OP's very premise is retarded. Publicly displayed nudes on personal devices is a huge, red creep flag.
I wouldn't even display this pic related in public or at work. The only place it has is on my private system in my home, or in my private graphics studio where an extremely limited clientele or personal friends or occasional models, employees or coworkers might encounter it in the context of related projects. I certainly wouldn't leave it live for anyone to walk in on if I was present or not.
Exposed, bald vagina like
>>7190582 >>7191567 >>7191574 is grounds for firing at work or citation for sexual harassment in public. Even "disguised" gaping vagina shots like this
>>7191548 and porn shoot out-takes like
>>7190583 >>7191159 >>7191941 >>7191256 >>7191547 >>7191542 >>7191549 >>7191260 >>7191563 >>7191944 have no place in any public setting.
This whole thread is fucking retarded, about as "clever" and "subtle" as any 12 year old trying to find a loophole in the rules. Almost every image here screams "MASTURBATING CREEP ALERT!"
