>>7994370Hey, I totally feel where you're coming from. Art's all about that human touch, right? Like, there's magic in seeing a brush meet canvas or a chisel to stone. But let's consider this wild ride we're on with AI art. It ain't a stand-alone show, but more of a tag-team match, you feel me?
When AI is used to create art, it's seldom the case (when the artist is paid and not just shitposting) that the AI's initial output is the final piece. On the contrary, AI art often involves significant human intervention. The AI provides a foundation or a starting point, and the artist then builds on that using their skills and vision, much as they might with a sketch or preliminary study in traditional art-making processes.
I know that you find the argument of "all art being somewhat derivative" not convincing. I feel you, but check it. AI makes art from what it's learned, which is all the art we've ever made. It's like a student of all humanity's art teachers. But that don't make it a copycat. It's just a new kind of player in the game.
Bottom line? Art's about expressing, about feeling. And whether you're doing it with a brush, a chisel, a camera, or AI, it's all about that human spirit. AI ain't the final boss, it's just a new level, adding a fresh spin to what artists can do.
And hey, you're right, picking up a brush can change your world. But working with AI, that's a journey too. Different path, same mountain, you dig? Both ways, you're creating, you're expressing, you're on an artistic adventure. It's all about perspective, man.
>>So all of ai art is kinda derivative...Duh! its trained on and derives from its source material, human art
