>>5909449>>5909798I sort of agree with you, but at the same time I think you're falling into the trap that lots of people fall into, namely only really considering anarcho-capitalism and collectivism.Your example is sound for the most part, but I think it's important to remember that the anarchist school is really vast (it makes our right-left, authoritarian-liberal conceptions look so childish), and I don't know of anyone who claims to have a full understanding of it.
My point ,I guess, is that anarchism's too big and diverse to say that we should all be anarchists together.
Personally I identify as an anarchist but I quite strongly disagree with anarcho-capitalists because I think that to see the state as our main barrier to freedom puts us in a situation where we could quite easily slip into a technologically advanced slave society (although maybe we already have)
