>>5660874The simple style of the UI doesn't match the style of the wallpaper chosen. I'm also not too fond of the rounded corners on the windows.
6/10
>>5660891Clock is huge and I don't like the wallpaper. With that said, however, everything works together very well. Taskbar and icon style matches with the wallpaper. Overall, pretty clean. Need to see opened applications to judge further.
7/10
>>5660919Clean. It all works well together. I don't know about that dark blue in the windows logo as well as the teal and mint green colors. I almost feel this desktop would work better with an either dual-tone or monochromatic color palette.
>>5660929Rates for rates
>>5660932Still a fan. This desktop made me decide to give a stripe pattern a go on my own wallpaper.
9/10
>>5660966rates for rates. (I think the transparent borders are an interesting touch)
>>5660977super low contrast between foreground and background. Not a huge fan of this one.
5/10
>>5661051Wallpaper is kind of unnerving. Side bar doesn't match bottom taskbar stylee. Clock is also a weird style and the numbers are spaced too far apart from each other imo.
5/10
>>5661056I like the overall setup here. The unneeded information kind of bothers me though. Do you really need hard drive space, memory usage, cpu load, and network rate on your desktop? With the said though, this is different from what I normally see.
7.5/10
>>5661057This is better without the mountain wallpaper. I'm not diggin the thick navbar on the right hand side though.
7/10
>>5661175I see you adjusted the taskbars/icons/clock. Still, that wallpaper creeps me out, man.
6/10
>>5661803Simple. Clean. The windows taskbar with all of those icons kind of bothers me. Really not a fan of the cpu and memory stats either. Get those fixed and you're a solid 9/10. However...
7.5/10
