>>7959193Spectacularly reddit and uninteresting take. Read Schmitt: it is more possible for a leader- or party-state to be representative than for a parliamentary state to be. Parliaments do not act on behalf of the people, they act as a heatsink for the energy of the people. Fascism is the most democratic system; this cannot be refuted; the defenders of liberalism say so and specifically point to people like you as those who defeat the popular will.
https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dziblatt/files/gidron_and_ziblatt_2019.pdfhttps://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=9A393CD057F7D43CDD1CDC081CED9F25You are not free by your own self-centered conception of freedom in this system, nor in any earlier iteration of liberalism. In order to have a society it is necessary to regulate behavior. For fascists, behavior is regulated for the greatest flourishing of the nation. You do not have the right to expose your genitalia to children, nor do you have the right to commit usury. These are crimes against the national community and, in fact, attacks on freedom. Gentile talks about this, and about the nonsensical and artificial nature of the liberal distinction between state and society.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26213815The total state is a fact and has been in America since FDR. Classical liberalism is not just a system that led to left- and right-socialism but a system that naturally gave way to the neoliberal total state that we are subject to. The question is what kind of total state we will be subject to: One that destroys the nation, or one that serves it. Right-liberals like you function exclusively as dampers on the nation's legitimate revolutionary and democratic impulses. Race traitor, toady of capital, you deserve insults from both nationalist and socialist alike.
But it's okay, we fascists or the Marxists will very soon put liberalism in the ground. I honestly don't care which at this point.
