>>6538055I didn't rate others last time, so here we go
>>6538074I like it a lot, I would however not use those icons - colored icons might look a lot better than you think on that background, 8/10
>>6538110Just great, I'm the anon who asked you to consider a darker middle bar, well deserved 10/10
>>6538545The clock is a bit too big, and the words are hard to read. Have you considered adding a similar box below those words? I'd rate it 9/10 if it had it, goes to 7.5/10 without it
>>6538547It must have been a bother to get those animations right, 9/10 just for that. The tiny icons do bug me a bit, but if they work for you, great!
>>6538679I like it. Steering away from bland colored backgrounds is always good! There are, however, a few caveats - namely the bar on top is not a good idea, and minimalism asks for flat icons, not those. Since I can't rate you for what it could be, 7/10.
>>6538686This looks really pretty. It just doesn't look like a functional phone, but maybe that's not what you're going for. I'm biased, so 7/10
>>6538692Looks great, the top rectangles not aligning triggers me though, 8.5/10
>>6538747This looks a lot like a screen I just rated, seems nice though 8/10
>>6538890You're getting there, remember these guidelines:
- Don't double info on the same screen
- Try to keep stuff aligned if you're not going for a specific look
>>6538941Deja vu, looks good.
>>6538963Black as fuck, but really well done. I suppose it's for your energy saving amoled :^) 9/10
>>6538978Lovely background and top left big font, hard to see smaller fonts. Remove shadow from the smaller ones and get them bolder, wonders shall happen. 7/10, easy 9.5 with decent small font
>>6539091That arrangement looks weird to me, and difficult to reach one side of the phone with the opposite hand, ah well. Try centering them more, and putting less stuff below too. Also, do more, it's very basic. 6/10
Decided to make mine more colorful due to suggestions. Rate?
