>>8042394I know you said scratch this one Anon, but this was by far the better (and likely original) copy of the image, the other version unfortunately just had way too many obvious multicolor artifacts and jaggies on it where someone had done a not very good job of both sharpening the image and changing the background to the brown color
Here I've upscaled the original image to 1440 width and then extended the background at the top to bring it to 3120 tall, I've then adjusted the color vibrance/saturation to somewhat match that of the second image so that you kinda get the best of both worlds.
Hope this is okay?
