>>7224830I do have to reduce the quality slightly on some of them in order to keep the resolution while keeping under the 6MB file size limit, but I'm trying to intelligently decide whether reducing quality or reducing resolution is a better solution. (E.g., If an image is 16k res, I could reduce the quality drastically to keep it under the limit, but, really, who views at 16k? So I'd rather keep quality and reduce resolution in that case.)
