>>5794112Looks pretty good. The angle of view and the focus makes it look like from a professional. Saved this one.
>>5794114First view quite good, but then I noticed, no wrong, I couldn't notice any of the details of the fernleaf. This image would be great, if the quality would be better. Not sure if it could be rescued, if you'll work with some filter, so the bad quality will be some sort of stylistic device.
>>5794116Damn, this one is cool. It looks like your camera works good for close-up images. Also saved.
>>5794152I like the focus and the detail of the moos. Saved.
>>5794197I think most people on /wg/ don't like picture wallpaper, because most of them are "just pictures of reality". No photoshop, no filters. The images look real, with normal light, but most of the screens can't display them right. Saturation and lightning effects doesn't appear right, if you take a picture outside and don't work with it afterwards.
>>5794212Cool, but your graphic card doesn't do a good job on antialiasing.
