Ratings from 0 to 9, there is no 10/10 desktop
>>68851108/10 I hate the fonts overall solid rice
>>68851127/10 unoriginal but acceptable
>>68851137/10 interface is looking stock-ish and doesn't blend in with anything, can be easily fixed though
>>68851349/10 decent use of curvy borders, ok fonts and colors are great, just needs to show off more
>>68851368/10 - wallpaper and colors blend nicely, but nothing too special
>>68851807/10 - great, but nothing too fancy we have already seen a lot of i3/awesome desktops like that
>>6885187cmd colors don't match with the the wallpaper or explorer also, the taskbar isn't minimalistic enough (icons)
>>6885215really old desktop, please change it
>>68852657/10 great but again, nothing really special
>>6885311No, stop doing that you see, the font you're using for these shortcuts doesn't belong in this kind of wallpaper that resembles a painting and assuming you used a font that looked like a painter's signature it still wouldn't fit because it would look tacky.
Wallpapers are supposed to be looked at, not interacted with, spreading icons apart makes your desktop UI less efficient the same can be said about icons on the desktop (why not just organize them within folders? why bother having a wallpaper if you cover it with icons?)
>>68853488/10 again, great desktop I just don't like the fonts, but I recognize that it's mostly window's fault
>>68853519/10
>>68855346/10 -1 for using a transparent terminal
>>68857068/10 another case of a great desktop but shit fonts
>>68857507/10 fucked up the terminal colors a bit I guess
>>68857908.5/10
why use default instead of graphite?
>>6885821 
