>>8002235>What are the odds?What, of that pic having that post ID? About as low as the odds of the FBI and CIA both not being so utterly corrupt that they actually got their shit together to actively prevent 9/11.
They both knew what was coming, they both knew the terrorists were already in country, they both knew how the job would be done, and they both couldn't be bothered to do anything about it, so they idly sat on their hands while thousands needlessly died to further a corrupt political agenda.
>>8002341Thing is NIST royally (deliberately) fucked up the report on WTC7; they more or less blamed its collapse solely on the fires within the building, when in fact the fires simply helped to finish a job started when a section of the perimeter wall steelwork of WTC7 had been struck and comprehensively severed from the penthouse terrace on the roof down to about floor 5 or 6 by a very large section of WTC1's perimeter steelwork when WTC1 collapsed.
If you watch the footage of WTC7 fall, just about all of which video is shot from the opposite side of the building that was actually damaged by WTC1, and then you compare that to the footage of that Florida beach hotel that partially collapsed a few years ago - ironically most of which footage is also from the opposite side of the hotel from where the initial failure of structural supports happened in the basement parking garage, the speed, and way the sections of both the hotel and WTC7 kinda rotationally twist, and fold in on themselves, around the point of failure as they drop is remarkably similar.
Had WTC7 been built with a more traditional construction method, like some of the other towers in the area, then the chances are pretty good that the damage it took from WTC1 would not have been fatal, though the building likely would still have needed to be pulled anyway as the cheaper option rather than attempting repairs.
https://wtc7fact.wordpress.com/ 
