>>8084239>the military that lost in AfghanistanYou mean the British? or maybe you mean the French? or do you mean the Soviets? Oh you mean the US... well they definitely weren't the first, and they certainly won't be the last...
>the military that drown boarding the HouthisClearly you've never been in combat, particularly at sea. Fact is that shit's dangerous on so many levels, and so of course accidents can and will randomly happen to anyone at any time, and that shouldn't ever be taken as a negative reflection against any military force of any size.
>the losers in NamYou mean the South Vietnamese?
After all the US got both North and South Vietnam to sign documents of peace before the US pulled out most/all of its forces. It was the North Vietnamese who ultimately broke that peace agreement (likely with China and Russia's help) when the North later re-invaded South Vietnam and 'unified' the country under a communist banner of conquest.
And just how has communism worked out for Vietnam in the long run... now that it's festooned from one end to the other in all kinds of shops representing decadent western brands.
You see, communism may be the great equalising socialist utopia and all that crap, but capitalism always wins out eventually - because people always want more money in their purse/wallet, and more new shiny shit to spend their hard-earned money on.
>Korea?Is Korea one country now? No, unlike Vietnam it's still divided into two, the Communist North and 'Democratic' South.
Well how'd that happen? You see, despite the over-ambitious efforts of MacArthur who nearly handed the whole of Korea to the Chinese, eventually Korea was left divided in a kind of mini-Cold War stalemate at the DMZ on the 38th Parallel, with US troops helping to protect the border on the southern side until comparatively recently. For sure not exactly a win, but also technically not a loss.
Ain't learning fun...
