>>809641>X must be wrong because it's logically possible to be wrongSorry, that's dumb.
If I can just assert that any statement doesn't necessarily mean what it means, then it's now impossible to ever prove anything, because the deduction in line 2 can be based on an "incorrect interpretation" or "incorrect translation" of line 1.
By reductio, your premise is false, because if it were true deductive reasoning would be impossible.
