>>253999Any suggestions? is it the RPM thats the issue?
>>254001You're not wrong, but I want to get a better understanding at least. I'm not just asking for people to tell me what to slap onto this build, and if I am asking that, I'm trying to understand why
like all I know about K CPU's now is that they seem to be the more overclock compatible of their counterparts? maybe slightly better base clock speed?
I know building PC's is like expensive legos, I can do that with only minimal fear, its just the technical parts I still need help with like GHz and apparently the RPM or whatever on my choice of Hard drives
