>>1174550It was all made up in the sense that there is no evidence that there was a widespread effort to break black bucks by sodomizing them. Tariq Nasheed would have us believe that sodomizing black men is a tool used by white oppressors to feminize them; make them not a threat. Tariq Nasheed is also a fucking racist lunatic who probably hates himself for his gay thoughts but that's just my opinion.
That being said, enslaved men were absolutely subject to sexual abuse. Sodomy was not something that was widely accepted, but not being accepted doesn't mean it didn't happen. Here's a pretty official looking source that seems to corroborate that raping of black males was something that happened:
https://historyengine.richmond.edu/episodes/view/6841IMO, the real answer is that it's not as systematic and widespread as that loser Tariq Nasheed would have you believe, but that doesn't mean that no white slave owner never raped his male slaves. It happened and people took notice of it, but it plenty of other vicious and depraved things were done to black men beyond just fucking them in the ass.