>>1151065>It sounds like it just needs to be "almost certainly" sure to be correct,"almost certainly" is so incredibly woolly as to degrade the question into "what did the poser mean by 'almost certainly'"?
(
>>1151049>So where's the paradox? "do we believe the premise?")You can't define "almost certainly" (or at least the question hasn't defined "almost certainly"), which makes the whole exercise a waste of time. It's basically now asking "imagine there's something that predicts what you're going to do by a means you don't understand. How do you understand it will behave if you try to trick it?"
