>>768085>Read againThat's earned you another pic related
First you said false consensus and group narrative was somehow important, ergo it was not a fact.
Now you're saying it is a fact, and false consensus is not important.
>Streaming is shit I never denied this.We're not talking about that here. We're talking about your pogrom against "pushing false consensus", and how you abandoned it like yesterday's fish the moment you were told what a fact was.
>Double standards don't existDon't use phrases you don't understand, unless you want to look stupid. The double standard is a logical fallacy (i.e. an argument that is always invalid). Specifically it's the fallacy of providing a rule, supporting the rule with evidence, then claiming without evidence that it doesn't apply to something you just proved it applies to. Sound familiar?
