>>1324785Just to clarify for anyone going through the archive like I did to learn more...
>https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/76657636/#q76664867Compare the output of
>cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/physical_block_size>cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/minimum_io_sizeIf they match even though the logical block size might be different
>cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/logical_block_sizeyour drive is partitioned just fine and you should do as
>>1325221 says. I got an enclouse for an old 7200 RPM 2.5 inch Sata 3.0 laptop drive (CMR) and it works wonders. I wish I knew all about this before buying 8 FUCKING TB of MSR 5200-5400 RPM storage like a dumbass.