>>1362045I guess you imagine yourself to be wiser and smarter than me so as to point on my mistakes and suggest to change, taking a dominant position of a "mentor" of sorts. Isn't that a bit narcissistic? Don't you think your sence of superiority may be false? Again, review your belief of my text being "verbose" rather than "detailed" (yes I used the word "verbose" wrongly, because I meant it without the "more than it is needed" part when I used it). I have already answered multiple times why I use exactly as much words as I need. I don't think all the pepeposters follow. To quote another anon "its a problem of your reading and comprehension skills" or even your ADHD making you unable to read through the text and catch all the messages in it.
>>1362050I am not them.
Did you read
>>1361734 and
>>1361694? And they tell me that I don't have to repeat myself. I don't think you did, because if that was the case you'd be trying to prove that I am a pseud by answering to points made there.
>>1361996>>1362000I don't show my insecurities to strangers on the internet. I am pretty confident in my mental ability. If that wasn't the case I would just cut the crap altogether and try to troll you back by being toxic in a defensive way (or just ignore all the negative remarks about myself and try the hardest to make those about all the anons calling me tarded) , but I just coldbloodedly respond to each "you retard" with "no I am not and here's why" instead. This isn't quite the way a person "in denial" acts
