>>1361618So, I guess then you think that if I were to start explaining myself, replying to your post, then it would confirm that I am a retard that can't tell obvious bait/trolling when he sees one? Is that correct? Well, I absolutely will:
consider the following:
being verbose may be as well signify pseudness, but does it necessarily imply it?
Not really.
Can a person be verbose in their explanation for other reasons other than inability to choose a different speech/writing style?
Absolutely!
In this particular case I am being a bit too verbose in my explanation of intelligence, because I want to be precise and accurate in my description of how I PERSONALLY understand the term (you know, its generally considered vaguely defined). Maybe there are people who disagree with me, who knows... If I were demanded to explain "intelligence" to a 6 y.o. them I WOULD be able to be less verbose in my explanation, but for now, this isn't what I am tasked with, is it (what is the averege age of a person here? like 24 or so?) so I CHOOSE to not be.
>>1361662How come? I am guessing you don't think they are retarded for knowing more than 1 language, but for being from 3rd world countries? Amirite?
