>>309386>Bull-fucking shit, and I say that as a bisexual longhair switch.Firstly, which "West"? Sweden isn't the United States.
Secondly: were you out and visually gender non-conforming during your teenage years, and did you socialize with strangers in arbitrary venues during late hours a lot, or were you mostly just within tight friend circles?
>>309389>If they all stopped doing it, that would be that.They would meet beatings and murder.
>You can't just boycott half of society.Good luck mobilizing every single woman in the society when they've been taught obedience to men from childhood.
This is so idiotic. Do you think women in Saudi Arabia could also just spontaneously mobilize and overthrow the male guardianship system and laws that have them jailed if they get raped by a non-husband? Do you think they enjoy those laws?
>still muh circumcisionSeriously, what makes you think losing your foreskin is comparable to this?
Hint: type 1 is rare, the others more common.
>>309392>But it's not: it's designed by women for women.Do you have any stats about the percentage ownership of big fashion brands by sex of owner and sex statistics of the most famous designers, or something like that?
>The worst you can accuse men of in this process is having evolved similar preferences and being manipulable by sexual signalling.No, the worst you can accuse them of is building legal and cultural institutions that bar women from becoming successful in life on their own terms, which makes them dependent on men and therefore subservient to their sexual desires, and it should be noted that said sexual desires are often constructed in such a way that conforming to them even *further* humiliates the women in the society, adding ever more to their oppression. Also see: ancient Chinese texts speaking about how sexy women with three-inch feet are, when they painfully wobble around on them. (Not a joke.)
