>>1506463>Which is better UHD or QLEDI understand OP's question, but some lurkers might not. Many QLED TVs are UHD, meaning they have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels, also known as 4K. There are plenty of UHD 4K screens that are not QLED, so OP's question is valid if you consider that context.
So, if OP is actually asking if he should pick the much lower-priced 4K UHD screen over the higher priced QLED 4K screen, then if both are 4K, the answer is QLED if the UHD version is a cheap brand (even tho the cheap brand looks very close in brightness and color). If the UHD version is a quality brand, then the answer is "your preference" as based on other features of that screen such as connectors, usb input, etc.
Why did I dislike the cheap UHD screen brand but accept the quality UHD screen in the above answer? The cheap chinese UHD brands _overdrive_ their LEDs to get enough brightness to compete with QLED. As a result, they dim over time as they wear and may burn out thus the screen gets dimmer due to fewer backlight LED. The better brands don't overdrive their LED as much and instead use more of them to provide brightness.
Generally, there's no need for QLED for computer monitor displays unless you have money to burn. I prefer smooth (not matte) computer monitor screens and get bright sharp colors that way. QLED can have screen burn-in problems, and many PC monitors display the same items in the same location all the time which is a behavior that creates burn-in. Examples would be desktop icons, the taskbar, certain windows, etc.
For a big screen TV in the living room, QLED is the way to go in my opinion.
