>>955983Oh get fucked. If the picture broke the blue-board picture rule, it would be deleted by now.
The rule in
>>1 isn't even about what's posted (that's covered by the
>>>/global/rules), it's about the nature of the request.
It's obvious you don't like this thread, but if you object to it on such obviously bogus grounds, you make it look like you don't actually know the rules yourself, and you make everyone else who doesn't like this thread look stupid by association.
>>955972>Why would you spend your time on the people that you dislike and don't want to see more of instead of contributing to the board?Who says it's not possible to do both?
Anyways, throughout this thread you've been reiterating an absolutely dreadful argument, so no wonder you keep getting guaranteed replies. If the guy who requests "top tier anime recommendations" EVERY WEEK said that his requests were worksafe requests and therefore no-one should spam his threads, he'd be making the same argument you are, and he'd be wrong too. His requests are worksafe requests, which means they don't get instantly deleted. It doesn't mean people aren't allowed to tell him he's not welcome.
