>>754222I'd like to think it all leads back to how certain doings can leave a physical/mental disturbance on the victim, depending on how they react to occurrence, of course
on a larger spectrum, minor economic/household resources are being taken advantage of for no cost of the individual, but at the cost of the government, in the act of infidelity (an act whereby rehabilitation may be of use). as someone who's undertaken microeconomics and trial law, I feel as no equivalent product of policy change can wreak havoc on a country's economy quite like, but not limited to infidelity
not only may it affect the individuals involved, it can also deeply hinder a country's ability to climb out of a recession and slump economic growth. I believe relatively short prison sentences will compensate for the actions of said individual on an economy, though minuscule; and instill regret in a sense that infidelity is not worth committing, just to head to prison for.
>What makes infidelity so different from your everyday conduct?that is where I see fit that a line between "ethics" and "economic and legal obligations" is to be drawn. it's called "manipulation" for a reason. in my sole discretion, what doesn't make manipulation "wrong" comes down to how crafty you are at duping people to make them believe all is fine and dandy; nobody, then, has anything to complain about
