>>1501300>Before the 90s, they had magazines with "lolicon" in the title that featured actual nude child models.I've never understood how Westerners revised "lolicon" to be 2D only. "Lolita complex" was coined as a term to describe attraction to real children. In the 80s and 90s nude child model mags with girls 10-13 were labeled "lolita" (while "alice" was used for 7-9). That isn't just in the past either. Even after the 1999 and 2014 bans "loli" and "lolicon" were and still are used to market child pornography and junior idol photography and videography. Self-professed lolicon still share CP on Japanese internet forums. Lolicon is invariably rooted in this.
>>1501305>The question I have is, do you agree that loli drawings can be produced without hurting anyone?I agree it's possible, but with how often I see artists reference or trace from real children it's impossible to say this material is definitively harmless.
