>>350904You should maybe break out a dictionary.
I know very well it's emulating an ABI, not a computer.
Maybe you didn't? It certainly seems like you skimmed the name without understanding what it meant. It's like you didn't realise it was riffing on GNU and LAME, or that it's a backronym from "WINdows Emulator".
You've still not explained why replacing Windows with a reverse-engineered emulation of Windows is a good idea. It sounds a lot like it's not.
It sounds like having to use all the sortof-working stuff on GNU/Apple/Redhat/Google/Linux every day is activating your almonds.
