>>1115194A lot of what you write rings true to me, except
>Feminised men become submissive men, the submissive wish to be dominatedIn my experience it's the opposite. In their wildest fantasies people tend to want something different, not more of the same shit they get every day. The powerful, the control freaks, the overly masculine - those are the prime audience for getting sexually dominated. Because they want to act out the taboo, the forbidden, the thing they can never let happen in their everyday life, they want to experience being at the mercy of someone else, finally able to let go. What did Trump ask Stormy Daniels to do? Spank him with a magazine because he's been a bad boy. That's what he fantasized about and I'm having a hard time calling him a "submissive man".
>>1115179>My point is that most people wouldn't think that, they wouldn't even care about that stuff.In the 60s and early 70s was a short period of sexual liberation in the US where literal porn played in movie theaters. Stuff like Deep Throat was famous country-wide. Incidentally the second film Linda Lovelace (the main star of Deep Throat) is most famous for is her getting fucked by a dog.
Tide that over into the 80s where arguably the biggest porn star of them all was an underaged girl - Traci Lords. Everyone knew her, hundreds of thousands of households had her VHS porn. Mind you, her age wasn't known, but it's hard to explain her fame without acknowledging that people are attracted to young bodies.
I'm not even getting into the nasty stuff like Eva Ionesco, where an abusive photographer mother got her nude 11yo daughter into the Italian Playboy magazine. In 1976. Sexualized nudes of a preteen were mainstream enough in the 70s that they appeared in Playboy. Let that sink in.
It's a hard pill to swallow but we humans were *never* innocent about this stuff. Not today, not in the 70s, and not inbetween either.
